Переход к основному содержанию
 Европа и Центральная Азия Европа и Центральная Азия
  • English
  • русский

Global Links

  • Назад к ЮНИСЕФ
  • Высокий контраст
 Европа и Центральная Азия Европа и Центральная Азия
    • Узнать о ЮНИСЕФ
      • О нас
      • Наш мандат
      • Региональный директор
      • Положение детей в регионе
      • Где мы работаем
      • Портал для родителей
      • Наши голоса: Молодёжь региона
      • Послы ЮНИСЕФ в Европе и Центральной Азии
      • Наши партнеры
  • Пресс-центр
Поддержать

Main navigation

  • Что мы делаем
  • Исследования и отчеты
  • Истории из региона
  • Действуйте
Search area has closed.
Search area has opened.
ПОИСКЗакрыть

Поиск ЮНИСЕФ

  • Доступно на:
  • English
  • русский
  • Українська
  • Отчет (2)
  • Программа (2)
  • Статья (2)
  • Фотоэссе (1)
  • #ОСТАНОВИТЬнасилие (1)
  • (-) Roma children (3)
  • Бедность (2)
  • Беженцы (2)
  • ВИЧ/СПИД (1)
  • Вакцины (12)
  • Вооружённый конфликт (3)
  • Гендерное насилие (1)
  • Грудное вскармливание (2)
  • Гуманитарный кризис и реагирование (2)
  • (-) Дети-беженцы и дети-мигранты (3)
  • Дискриминация (1)
  • Защита детей (3)
  • Здравоохранение (6)
  • Иммунизация (12)
  • Коммуникации в целях развития (1)
  • Мигрант и кризис с беженцами (5)
  • Образование (1)
  • Образование в чрезвычайных ситуациях (1)
  • Охрана здоровья новорожденных (3)
  • Охрана материнского здоровья (1)
  • Питание (1)
  • (-) Питание детей грудного и раннего возраста (1)
  • Права детей (4)
  • Права человека (2)
  • Развитие детей раннего возраста (1)
  • (-) Развитие детей раннего возраста (0)
  • Цели Устойчивого Развития (1)
  • Болгария (4)
  • Босния и Герцеговина (5)
  • Греция (4)
  • Европа и Центральная Азия (2)
  • Испания (1)
  • Италия (3)
  • Региональный офис ЮНИСЕФ по странам Европы и Центральной Азии (11)
  • (-) Региональный офис ЮНИСЕФ по странам Европы и Центральной Азии (7)
  • Республика Молдова (1)
  • Сербия (4)
  • Турция (1)
  • Украина (1)
Article
13 Май 2021
Empowering refugee and migrant children to claim their right to health: Improving health literacy
https://www.unicef.org/eca/stories/empowering-refugee-and-migrant-children-claim-their-right-health-improving-health-literacy
“I have always had to behave ‘like a girl’ and I am not used to being asked for my opinion, but you ask me to say what I think during these workshops.”   A 13-year-old girl from Syria describes the impact of empowerment workshops in Serbia  Boy is drawing a picture. UNICEF-supported activities for children on the island of Lesvos, Greece The ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative has supported work across five European countries to improve health literacy among refugee and migrant children over the past year. As a result, they and their families have learned about key health issues, about the health services available to them, and how to demand health services as their right. Through its support for health literacy – the ability to find, understand and use information to take care of your own health – the initiative has helped to dismantle some key barriers to health services for refugee and migrant children and their families in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy and Serbia. This 27-month, €4.3 million co-funded initiative, which was launched in January 2020 by the European Union Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, works alongside young refugees and migrants to ensure that they have accurate health information in their own languages – information that reaches them via the channels they use and the people they trust. Importantly, the initiative makes them more aware of their right to health care in these European countries – welcome news for those who have fled from countries where good quality health care is either unaffordable or unavailable. With support from the initiative, UNICEF and its partners first worked with young refugees and migrants to identify gaps in the information available to them and in their own knowledge. This informed the health literacy packages that have been rolled out in all five countries over the past year, spanning a wide range of topics from immunization and nutrition to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and gender-based violence (GBV). The packages themselves have been backed by detailed plans to ensure that their messages reach their audiences and gain real traction. Great care has been taken to ensure that information materials are culturally appropriate, gender sensitive and child-friendly, and that they are suitable for the ages and backgrounds of their audiences. Cultural mediators and interpreters have helped to overcome language and cultural barriers, while materials have been made available in, for example, Arabic, Farsi and Pashto. Activities have often been led by trusted professionals, such as nurses, physicians and psychologists who are already familiar with the needs of refugee and migrant children and their families. Materials have been shared through channels and locations that are well-used by refugees and migrants, including asylum offices, temporary reception centres, health centres, Mother and Baby Corners (MBCs), workshops and discussion sessions, during outreach activities and via social media. As a result, health literacy is now embedded into existing activities with refugee and migrant children and parents across all five countries, and is based firmly on their views and needs. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, information workshops have been tailored to the needs of different groups of children, including those who are unaccompanied and separated. Topics over the past year have included personal and oral hygiene, drug and alcohol use and its impact on health, the importance of immunization, early childhood development, medical referrals and the proper use of medicines and the risks of self-medication, as well as COVID-19 risks and prevention and services for those with symptoms. Health literacy on immunization, for example, has been strengthened through close cooperation with the Institutes for Public Health and local primary health centres, helping to ensure that refugees and migrants are aware of the national immunization calendar and protocols.  In all, 1,428 refugee and migrant children and their parents have received vital information on immunization, 840 have received information on mental health and psycho-social services, and 580 (nearly double the target) have received information on maternal and child health care and nutrition.  In Bulgaria, the initiative has supported group sessions that have exceeded their targets, with 99 sessions held for refugee children and mothers – more than three times the 28 sessions envisaged. There were more than twice as many information sessions on gender-based violence as originally planned: 107 rather than 48. In all, 600 refugee and migrant children and their parents have received information on immunization, 600 on mental health and psycho-social services, and 600 on maternal and child health, with every target for these areas met or surpassed in terms of the numbers of children reached.   “Guiding people from refugee and migrant backgrounds on health-related procedures in their host country is a way to empower them to find solutions to health issues.”    Yura, a social worker with the Council of Refugee Women in Bulgaria (CRWB) In Greece, support from the initiative has enabled UNICEF and its partners to equip refugee and migrant children with information on health risks, entitlements and services through its non-formal education programme in urban areas and on the islands. In the first full year of the initiative, 1,796 children and 464 parents have received crucial information to help them safeguard their own health.   In addition, information on mental health risks, entitlements and services has been shared with 587 refugee and migrant children on Lesvos through existing psychosocial support activities at the Child and Family Support Hub (CFSH), including counselling, information sessions, parent sessions and more. Refugee and migrant women and children using the UNICEF-supported Safe Space in Athens and the CFSH on Lesvos have had access to information on GBV, with 1,313 women and 687 children reached to date. Another 1,183 mothers and 596 children have received information on maternal and child health via the CFSH on Lesvos and at child-friendly spaces within the Asylum Service Offices in Athens and Thessaloniki.  In Italy, there has been an emphasis on peer-to-peer health literacy over the past year. Young refugees and migrants have shared critical health messages through, for example, the U-Report on the Move platform – a user-friendly, cost-effective and anonymous digital platform with more than 6,000 subscribers, where they speak out on the issues that matter to them. Brochures on immunization, mental health and GBV have been translated into seven languages, and a live chat on reproductive health and the concept of ‘consent’ has been conducted in partnership with the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). ‘Q&A’ publications have provided clear answers to burning questions on immunization, mental health and GBV, with short videos explaining, for example, what to do if someone you know has been subjected to violence, and how to protect yourself from online abuse. In the first full year of the ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative, more than 10,887 refugees and migrants in Italy have benefited from critical information on health-related risks and services. The health literacy package supported by the initiative is being shared beyond refugee and migrant communities to reach local communities and key stakeholders, with human interest stories aiming to increase public awareness of the lives of refugees and migrants. The initiative’s targets for health literacy in Serbia have also been exceeded, with 1,094 refugee and migrant children and parents receiving information on mental health (original target: 500) and 722 receiving information on GBV (original target: 600). Looking beyond the sheer numbers of beneficiaries, those taking part in health literacy workshops, in particular, have voiced their appreciation. One woman from Syria who took part in a GBV workshop commented: “I think that women, especially in our culture, do not recognize violence because they think it’s normal for men to be louder, to yell, that they have the right to have all their whims fulfilled even if their wife wants or needs something different. It is a form of inequality we are used to. That is why it is important to talk about it, as you do, to have more workshops on these topics with women from our culture, so that we realize we should not put up with anything that is against our will or that harms us and our health.”   Another woman from Syria, who participated in a workshop on mental health and psychosocial support, said:  “If it weren't for these workshops you’re organizing, our stay in the camp would be so gloomy. I notice that women are in a much better mood and smiling during the workshops, more than in our spare time. You have a positive impact on us.”   Materials have been available in six languages and have covered access to health services, mental health issues, GBV, breastfeeding and infant and young child feeding, breastfeeding during the COVID-19 pandemic, recommendations for parents of children aged 1-6 months, recommendations for children aged 7-24 months, and substance abuse. To reach key stakeholders beyond refugee and migrant communities, a project information sheet and human-interest stories have been widely shared via social media and other well-used channels. Work is now underway in Serbia, with support from the ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative, to develop a new information package and tools to prevent and respond to sexual violence against boys. This will be rolled out in 2021 in close partnership with key actors in child protection, including those who work directly with boys from refugee and migrant communities. The first full year of support from the ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative shows what can be achieved when refugee and migrant children, women and parents are all treated as champions for their own health, rather than the passive recipients of health care. Once equipped with the right information, including the knowledge of their fundamental right to health services, they are more likely to demand the health care to which they are entitled. Logo - Strengthening Refugee and Migrant Children’s Health Status in Southern and South Eastern Europe This story is part of the Project ‘Strengthening Refugee and Migrant Children’s Health Status in Southern and South Eastern Europe’, co-funded by the Health Programme of the European Union (the ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative). It represents the views of the author only and is her sole responsibility; it cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission and/or the European Health and Digital Executive Agency or any other body of the European Union. The European Commission and the Agency do not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains. 
Article
13 Май 2021
Safeguarding the health of refugee and migrant children during COVID-19
https://www.unicef.org/eca/stories/safeguarding-health-refugee-and-migrant-children-during-covid-19
"When COVID arrived here, I thought: ‘It's over, it will spread throughout the building’. I didn't think it was possible to avoid the spread of the outbreak. Instead, we have had very few cases and we owe this, above all, to the support we received from INTERSOS and UNICEF."  Josehaly (Josy), a refugee living in Rome A field worker from Intersos fastens a mask for a young refugee girl in Rome. A field worker from Intersos fastens a mask for a young refugee girl in Rome. The ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative is funding work across five European countries to keep refugee and migrant children connected to health services. While the COVID-19 pandemic was not foreseen when the initiative was first launched, the strategic principles underpinning the ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative – flexibility, responsiveness to real needs, and building on what works – meant that UNICEF and partners could swing into action to safeguard the health and wellbeing of refugee and migrant children and overcome intensified and unprecedented challenges. Since the launch of the 27-month ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative in January 2020, activities were adapted quickly to address access to health services during the COVID-19 crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Greece, Italy and Serbia. This €4.3 million initiative, co-funded by the European Union Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety, has shown refugee and migrant children and families how to protect themselves and others, and that they have every right to health care – even in a pandemic. The rapid escalation of the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe in 2020 exacerbated the already worrying state of health and wellbeing of the region’s most vulnerable people, including refugee and migrant children, and has had a protracted impact on their access to health and other vital services. The situation has been particularly dire for refugees and migrants who are not in formal reception sites, and who are, therefore, harder to reach and monitor. Refugee and migrant families living in over-crowded conditions with limited access to sanitation are at high risk of infection. These communities have often had to face a ‘double lockdown’, confined to their settlements and camps and having little or no access to accurate information on protecting themselves and others.  The additional pressures have been severe. UNICEF and its partners in Bulgaria have seen appeals for support double from 30 to 60 cases per day. Far more refugees and asylum-seekers have been in urgent need of financial and material support, having lost their incomes because of the pandemic. There have been increased requests for support to meet the cost of medical care for children, which is not covered by the state budget, and more requests for psychosocial support. This increase in demand has, of course, coincided with serious challenges for service delivery. Restrictions on movement have curtailed in-person services, and partners have had to adapt the way in which they connect with refugees and migrants. The pandemic has had a direct impact on the provision of group sessions to share health-related information, as well as on the timely identification of children and women suffering from or at risk of health-related issues. The impact on vital services for timely and quality maternal and child health care, psychosocial support, recreational and non-formal services, and on services to prevent and respond to gender-based violence (GBV) has been profound. In Bulgaria, UNICEF and its partners were able to take immediate measures with support from the ‘RM Child-Health’ initiative to alleviate the impact, including online awareness raising and information sessions and the use of different channels for communication, including social media. UNICEF’s partners, the Council of Refugee Women in Bulgaria (CRWB) and the Mission Wings Foundation (MWF) adapted service delivery to allow both face-to-face interaction (while maintaining social distancing for safety) as well as assistance online and by telephone. Partners were able to continue to provide direct social services support while also delivering online consultations to refugees and migrants on cases of violence, as well as referral to specialized services. In Greece, the initiative supported the development of child-friendly information posters and stickers for refugee and migrant children and their families on critical preventive measures and on what to do and where to go if they experience any COVID-19 symptoms. In Italy, the initiative has supported outreach teams and community mobilization, providing refugee and migrant families with the information and resources they need to keep the pandemic at bay. In Rome, for example, health promoters from Intersos continued to work directly with refugee and migrant communities in informal settlements, not only to prevent infection but also to keep their spirits high, as one health promoter explained: "We have organized housing modules that are not only designed to keep the community safe, but also to stop loneliness overwhelming the people forced into isolation. The entire community has assisted people affected by the virus by cooking, washing clothes and offering all possible support, particularly to the children."  UNICEF and its partners in Italy, as in other countries, have aimed to maintain continuity and unimpeded access to key services. Child protection, for example, has been mainstreamed into all project activities, and additional measures have been introduced, with a ramping up of activities to raise awareness and share information. UNICEF partners adapted quickly to the pandemic, with Médecins du Monde (MdM) activating a hotline number to provide remote counselling and psychological first aid (PFA). Centro Penc shifted to remote case management and individual psychological support, strengthening the capacity of cultural mediators to support GBV survivors, with UNICEF’s support. Young people were consulted and engaged through UNICEF’s online platform U-Report on the Move, with young U-reporters sharing information on the increased risks of GBV, as well as on available services. In Serbia, the initiative has supported UNICEF’s efforts to improve the immunization process for refugee children and migrants by strengthening the assessment and monitoring process. As a result of such efforts, refugees and migrants have been included in the national COVID-19 Immunization Plan.  
Photo Essay
10 Май 2018
Breastfeeding: the best gift a mother can give her child
https://www.unicef.org/eca/stories/breastfeeding-best-gift-mother-can-give-her-child
Breastmilk saves lives, protects babies and mothers against deadly diseases, and leads to better IQ and educational outcomes, yet rates of breastfeeding in Europe and Central Asia are low, with only 23 percent of the wealthiest families and 31 percent of the poorest breastfeeding up to the recommended age of two. Empowering and enabling women to breastfeed  needs to be at the heart of countries’ efforts to keep every child alive and to build healthy, smart and productive societies. “Breastfeeding is the best gift a mother, rich or poor, can give her child, as well as herself,” said Shahida Azfar, UNICEF’s Deputy Executive Director. “We must give the world’s mothers the support they need to breastfeed.” A mother breasfeeds her baby at a maternity centre in Tashkent region, Uzbekistan. A mother breasfeeds her baby at a maternity centre in Tashkent region, Uzbekistan.  The early initiation of breastfeeding – putting newborns to the breast within the first hour of life – safeguards infants from dying during the most vulnerable time in their lives.  Immediate skin-to skin contact and starting breastfeeding early keeps a baby warm, builds his or her immune system, promotes bonding, boosts a mother’s milk supply and increases the chances that she will be able to continue exclusive breastfeeding.   A mother learns to breastfeed her baby at a maternity hospital in Fergana, Uzbekistan. A mother learns to breastfeed her baby at a maternity hospital in Fergana, Uzbekistan. Breastmilk is safe as it is the right temperature, requires no preparation, and is available even in environments with poor sanitation and unsafe drinking water. It’s also more than just food for babies – breastmilk is a potent medicine for disease prevention that is tailored to the needs of each child. The ‘first milk’ – or colostrum – is rich in antibodies to protect babies from disease and death.   A patronage nurse teachers a mother how to breastfeed in Kyzylorda city, Kazakhstan. A patronage nurse teachers a mother how to breastfeed in Kyzylorda city, Kazakhstan.  In Kazakhstan, UNICEF has been working with patronage nurses to support mothers to breastfeed their children. The project has been running for several years and includes two visits during pregnancy and nine visits until the child reaches the age of three. As a result, there was a 14 percent increase in the number of children who were exclusively breastfed in the pilot region. A patronage nurse visits a family in Kyzylorda city, Kazakhstan. A patronage nurse visits a family in Kyzylorda city, Kazakhstan.  There are several reasons why a mother may not be able to breastfeed, or does not wish to do so. Reasons include low awareness of the importance of breastfeeding and long-term impacts, as well as not knowing how to breastfeed properly which can subsequently cause the mother a lot of pain. Patronage nurses work with mothers to try to overcome these obstacles.    A mother breastfeeds her baby, while the father and the older son support them. Mother Jovana breastfeeds her son Aleksa (two-months-old) while older son Ognjen (18-months-old) and husband Nikola support her at a clinic in Serbia.  Breastfeeding is not a one-woman job. Women who choose to breastfeed need support from their governments, health systems, workplaces, communities and families to make it work.  UNICEF urges governments, the private sector and civil society to create more enabling environments for breastfeeding mothers including arming mothers with the knowledge to make informed decisions, and providing them with the support they need from their families, communities, workplaces and healthcare systems to make exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months happen. Smiling parents watch as their baby breastfeeds at a maternity unit in Armenia. Smiling parents watch as their baby breastfeeds at a maternity unit in Armenia. In Armenia, UNICEF, together with the ministry of health and local health authorities, have created a sustainable parental education system at maternity and primary health-care facilities across the country to encourage breastfeeding and provide support to parents. In a UNICEF-supported space for refugee and migrant families, two mothers breastfeed their babies. In a UNICEF-supported space for refugee and migrant families in Serbia, two mothers breastfeed their babies.  During the refugee and migrant crisis in Europe, UNICEF stepped in to provide support for children and mothers. Support included providing private spaces for breastfeeding mothers, nutritional guidance and breastfeeding support. UNICEF supports action to improve infant and young child nutrition across Europe and Central Asia, aiming to ensure that every child has the best possible nutritional start in life. Through its global campaign, Every Child ALIVE , which demands solutions on behalf of the world’s newborns, UNICEF urges governments, the private sector and civil society to:   Increase funding and awareness to raise breastfeeding rates from birth through the age of two.  Put in place strong legal measures to regulate the marketing of infant formula and other breastmilk substitutes as well as bottles and teats.   Enact paid family leave and put in place workplace breastfeeding policies, including paid breastfeeding breaks.  Implement the ten steps to successful breastfeeding in maternity facilities, and provide breastmilk for sick newborns.  Ensure that mothers receive skilled breastfeeding counselling at health facilities and in the first week after delivery.  Strengthen links between health facilities and communities, so that mothers are ensured of continued support for breastfeeding.  Improve monitoring systems to track improvements in breastfeeding policies, programmes and practices.     
Programme
02 Октябрь 2017
Roma children
https://www.unicef.org/eca/what-we-do/ending-child-poverty/roma-children
The Roma are one of Europe’s largest and most disadvantaged minority groups. Of the 10 to 12 million Roma people in Europe, around two-thirds live in central and eastern European countries. While some have escaped from poverty, millions live in slums and lack the basic services they need, from healthcare and education to electricity and clean water.  Discrimination against Roma communities is commonplace, fuelling their exclusion. Far from spurring support for their social inclusion, their poverty and poor living conditions often reinforce the stereotyped views of policymakers and the public. And far from receiving the support that is their right, Roma children face discrimination that denies them the essentials for a safe, healthy and educated childhood.   Discrimination against Roma children can start early, and have a life-long impact. The problems facing Roma children can start early in life. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, for example, Roma infants are four times more likely than others to be born underweight. They are also less likely to be registered at birth, and many lack the birth certificate that signals their right to a whole range of services.   As they grow, Roma children are more likely to be underweight than non-Roma children and less likely to be fully immunized. Few participate in early childhood education. They are less likely than non-Roma children to start or complete primary school, and Roma girls, in particular, are far less likely to attend secondary school. Only 19 per cent of Roma children make it this far in Serbia, compared to 89 per cent of non-Roma children.  There are also disparities in literacy rates across 10 countries in the region, with rates of 80 per cent for Roma boys and just under 75 per cent for Roma girls, compared to near universal literacy rates at national level.    Roma children are too often segregated into ‘remedial’ classes within regular schools, and are more likely to be in ‘special’ schools – a reflection of schools that are failing to meet their needs, rather than any failure on their part.   In Roma communities, child marriage may be perceived as a ‘valid’ way to protect young girls, and as a valued tradition. In reality, such marriages deepen the disparities experienced by girls, and narrow their opportunities in life.  In many Balkan countries, half of all Roma women aged 20-24 were married before the age of 18, compared to around 10 per cent nationally. Child marriage and school drop-out are closely linked, particularly for girls, and such marriages also expose girls to the dangers of early pregnancy and childbirth, as well as a high risk of domestic violence. 
Programme
18 Октябрь 2017
Refugee and migrant children in Europe
https://www.unicef.org/eca/refugee-and-migrant-children
People have always migrated to flee from trouble or to find better opportunities. Today, more people are on the move than ever, trying to escape from climate change, poverty and conflict, and aided as never before by digital technologies. Children make up one-third of the world’s population, but almost half of the world’s refugees: nearly 50 million children have migrated or been displaced across borders.   We work to prevent the causes that uproot children from their homes While working to safeguard refugee and migrant children in Europe, UNICEF is also working on the ground in their countries of origin to ease the impact of the poverty, lack of education, conflict and insecurity that fuel global refugee and migrant movements. In every country, from Morocco to Afghanistan, and from Nigeria to Iraq, we strive to ensure all children are safe, healthy, educated and protected.  This work accelerates and expands when countries descend into crisis. In Syria, for example, UNICEF has been working to ease the impact of the country’s conflict on children since it began in 2011. We are committed to delivering essential services for Syrian families and to prevent Syria's children from becoming a ‘ lost generation ’. We support life-saving areas of health , nutrition , immunization , water and sanitation, as well as education and child protection . We also work in neighbouring countries to support Syrian refugee families and the host communities in which they have settled.   
Report
01 Июль 2015
The Rights of Roma Children and Women
https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/rights-roma-children-and-women
THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMENin Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia A comparative review and further analysis of findings from MICS surveys in Roma settlements in the three countries The Rights of Roma Children and Women in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia: A comparative review and further analysis of findings from MICS surveys in Roma settlements in the three countries Principal authorAniko Bernat Overall development and reviewSiraj Mahmudlu, UNICEF Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist Elena Gaia, UNICEF Policy Analysis SpecialistAna Abdelbasit, UNICEF consultant Editorial supportAnthony BurnettAnna Grojec Review and inputsAleksandra Jovic, Child Rights Monitoring Specialist, UNICEF office in SerbiaSabina Zunic, Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist, UNICEF office in Bosnia and HerzegovinaZoran Stojanov, Monitoring and Evaluation Officer, UNICEF office in the former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaProfessor Slobodan Cvejic, Director of Research, SeCons Development Initiative Group, Serbia Suggested citation The United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF), Geneva, July 2015 Permission is required to reproduce any part of this publication. Permission will be freely granted to educational or non-profit organizations. To request permission and any other information on the publication, please contact: United Nations Childrens Fund (UNICEF)Regional Office for Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CEE/CIS)Palais des NationsCH-1211 Geneva 10Switzerland Tel.: +41 22 909 5000Fax: +41 22 909 5909Email: ceecis@unicef.org All reasonable precautions have been taken by UNICEF to verify the information contained in this publication. Design and layout: Cover photo: UNICEF/CEECIS2011/Mcconnico THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMENin Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia A comparative review and further analysis of findings from MICS surveys in Roma settlements in the three countries for countries to invest in Roma children and young people as engines of sustainable development and actors of social change. Real evidence about the situation and rights of Roma children, young people and women continues to be, unfortunately, largely missing. Such lack of information hinders the implementation of effective social inclusion policies. In response, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia are among the first countries ever to collect data, through a representative and reliable process, using the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS), and make disaggregated data about Roma children publicly available. Drawing on these efforts, The Rights of Roma Children and Women in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia aims to document how Roma children fare in comparison to national averages for all children, and where achievements have been made in social inclusion in the three countries. Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia deserve our praise for their commitment to the most vulnerable. Their investments in disaggregated data collection are already paying off. With the data presented in this study, the three countries are now able to track and document progress for different groups of children and measure the value for money of public policies. The examples from the three countries have already inspired some of the neighbouring countries, such as Montenegro, which has recently concluded its MICS, for the first time with an additional focus on Roma settlements. I believe that this study will inspire other countries to follow a similar path in the realization of the rights enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and other human rights standards for children, including those of the European Union. As this study demonstrates, UNICEFs core contribution is to generate systematic knowledge and strengthen national institutions and capacities to track, reach, protect and include the most disadvantaged children, among them Roma children. UNICEF stands ready to provide support to sharpen national systems to realize all rights for all children everywhere. There has been great progress for children in Central and Eastern Europe and Central Asia following the entry into force of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989, and since UNICEF began its programmes of cooperation with several countries of the region more than 20 years ago. Such positive transformations in the realization of childrens rights have contributed significantly to democracy, the rule of law and human rights. But are children benefiting equally from improved living conditions and access to services and opportunities? Do all children enjoy the same opportunities to develop and thrive? Or are particular groups of children being left behind? The post-2015 agenda is one of global action for children, engaging everyone governments, institutions, corporations, communities, families and individuals in every country. This is an extraordinary opportunity to document past achievements, assess the challenges that lie ahead and drive change for every child, especially the most disadvantaged and vulnerable children. Across Europe, there are several groups of children who are at risk of being excluded, hard to reach and most vulnerable. Among these, Roma children are particularly at risk of having their rights denied. Discrimination against Roma children starts even before they are born, due to lack of adequate prenatal and maternal health care. Too often, it accompanies them throughout their lives. Of the 12 million Roma people living in Europe, half 6 million people are estimated to be under 18 years of age. This figure highlights the urgency of breaking the vicious circle of discrimination as early as possible: through adequate support at home, in public services and in society at large, Roma boys and girls can have an equal start, enjoy a better life, contribute to their own culture and join their fellow citizens in building the economies and societies of their respective countries. Roma children present a real opportunity for Europe. By investing in all children today, Europe will be able to achieve its social inclusion targets by 2020, in particular those related to poverty reduction, early school leaving and employment and activity rates. The 2011 European Union Framework for National Roma Integration Strategies and the 2013 European Commissions Recommendation Investing in Children: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage provide a solid policy environment FOREWORDby Marie-Pierre Poirier, UNICEF Regional Director iii Iv THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN Roma children present a real opportunity for Europe. By investing in all children today, Europe will be able to achieve its social inclusion targets by 2020. UNICEF/CEECIS2011/Mcconnico v Bos nia and Her zego vina : MIC S S urve y of Rom a S ettle men ts a nd N atio nal S urve y, 2 011 2012 The form er Y ugos lav Rep ublic of M aced onia : MIC S S urve y of Rom a S ettle men ts a nd N atio nal S urve y, 2 0112 Ser bia: MIC S S urve y of Rom a S ettle men ts a nd N atio nal S urve y, 2 0103 Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal HO US EH OLD S B Y P RE SE NC E O F C HIL DR EN AN D C HIL DR EN S L IvIN G A RR AN GE ME NT S A ND OR PH AN HO OD Hou seho lds with chi ldre nH ouse hold s w ith at le ast One chi ld a ged 04 year snd 4nd 35nd nd13 ndnd 38nd nd17 ndnd 48nd nd17 per cent One chi ld a ged 017 ye ars ndnd 68nd nd50 ndnd 70nd nd44 ndnd 78nd nd37 per cent Orp hane d ch ildre nC hild ren age 017 ye ars livin g w ith neith er b iolo gica l pa rent 34 41 00 14 21 11 27 41 21 per cent Prev alen ce o f ch ildre n w ith o ne o r bo th p aren ts d ead 54 44 33 34 31 22 32 21 22 per cent TH E R IGH T F RO M B IRT H T O A NA ME , A N AT ION ALI TY A ND AN IDE NT ITY Birt h re gist ratio n5B irth regi stra tion 9596 96nd ndnd 9998 9810 010 010 098 100 9999 9999 per cent TH E R IGH T T O A N A DE QU AT E S TAN DA RD OF LIv ING Wat er a nd sani tatio nU se o f im prov ed drin king -wat er sour ces ndnd 97nd nd10 0nd nd99 ndnd 100 ndnd 98nd nd10 0pe r ce nt Use of impr oved sa nita tion ndnd 73nd nd94 ndnd 91nd nd93 ndnd 85nd nd98 per cent Pla ce fo r ha nd was hing 6nd nd92 ndnd 98nd ndnd ndnd ndnd nd91 ndnd 99pe r ce nt Ava ilabi lity of s oap ndnd 97nd nd99 ndnd ndnd ndnd ndnd 96nd nd99 per cent Sol id f uel u seU se o f so lid f uels as the prim ary sour ce of d omes tic e nerg y to coo k ndnd 92nd nd70 ndnd 33nd nd34 ndnd 76nd nd32 per cent SU MM AR Y T AB LE1 vI THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal TH E R IGH T T O H EA LTH Low bi rthw eigh tLo w b irthw eigh t in fant s (b elow 2,5 00 gram s) ndnd 14nd nd3 ndnd 11nd nd6 ndnd 10nd nd5 per cent Infa nts wei ghed at birt hnd nd96 ndnd 98nd nd94 ndnd 96nd nd96 ndnd 100 per cent Nut ritio nal stat usU nder wei ght prev alen ce Mod erat e an d S ever e (- 2 S D) 99 92 12 87 82 11 77 72 22 per cent Sev ere (- 3 SD )2 32 11 12 22 00 01 21 11 1pe r ce nt Stu ntin g pr eval ence per cent Mod erat e an d S ever e (- 2 S D) 2220 219 99 2112 176 45 2523 246 77 per cent Sev ere (- 3 SD )9 78 44 43 33 22 211 810 34 3pe r ce nt Was ting prev alen ce Mod erat e an d S ever e (- 2 S D) 88 82 22 45 52 12 56 53 44 per cent Sev ere (- 3 SD )4 34 21 21 22 00 03 22 11 1pe r ce nt Bre astf eedi ng and infa nt feed ing Chi ldre n ev er brea stfe dnd nd95 ndnd 95nd nd96 ndnd 94nd nd93 ndnd 90pe r ce nt Ear ly in itiat ion of brea stfe edin gnd nd50 ndnd 42nd nd39 ndnd 21nd nd10 ndnd 8pe r ce nt Exc lusi ve brea stfe edin g un der 6 m onth s (20) (24) 2218 1919 (*) (*) (32) 3116 2314 49 1413 14pe r ce nt Con tinue d br east feed ing at 1 ye ar (42) (*) 5013 1212 (*) (*) (53) (28) (39) 3448 5754 2414 18pe r ce nt Con tinue d br east feed ing at 2 ye ars (68) (*) 6915 1012 (*) (*) (55) (14) (11) 1341 (31) 3721 915 per cent Pred omin ant brea stfe edin g un der 6 m onth s (63) (65) 6461 3346 (*) (*) (68) 4742 4452 (53) 5244 3639 per cent Dur atio n of br east feed ing 2024 2510 78 2214 188 1110 1315 148 78 mon ths Age -app ropr iate br east feed ing (02 3 m onth s) 4138 4020 1718 4738 4326 1922 3334 3422 1619 per cent Min imum mea l fr eque ncy (62 3 m onth s) 6258 6071 7472 6956 6371 5965 6777 7284 8484 per cent vII Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Bre astf eedi ng and infa nt feed ing Bot tle fe edin g (0 23 mon ths) 5459 5677 8280 6868 6882 7779 8282 8285 8585 per cent Milk feed ing freq uenc y fo r no n-br east fed child ren (62 3 m onth s) (83) (73) 7893 8991 (84) (69) 7693 9192 5961 6090 8989 per cent Intr oduc tion of s olid , se mi-s olid or soft fo ods (68 mon ths) (*) (*) (67) (68) (*) 71(* )(* )(* )(3 9)(4 2)41 (48) (84) 6592 7784 per cent Vacc inat ions re ceiv ed b y 12 m onth s of age (b y 18 mon ths of a ge fo r M MR )7 Tube rcul osis im mun izat ion cove rage ndnd 86nd nd98 ndnd 96nd nd97 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Polio imm uniz atio n co vera gend nd14 ndnd 85nd nd81 ndnd 92nd ndnd ndnd ndpe r ce nt Imm uniz atio n co vera ge fo r di phth eria , per tuss is and teta nus (DP T) ndnd 13nd nd86 ndnd 78nd nd92 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Mea sles im mun izat ion cove rage ndnd 22nd nd80 ndnd 89nd nd92 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Hep atiti s B im mun izat ion cove rage ndnd 15nd nd84 ndnd 85nd nd91 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Hae mop hilu s in fluen zae type B (Hib ) im mun izat ion cove rage 8 ndnd ndnd ndnd ndnd 90nd nd94 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Car e of illn ess Ora l reh ydra tion ther apy with co ntin ued feed ing 5450 5260 4855 (51) (55) 5372 (60) 6756 6360 5368 60pe r ce nt Car e se ekin g fo r su spec ted pneu mon ia (78) (82) 80(9 2)(8 0)87 (*) (*) (76) (*) (*) (77) 9390 9289 9190 per cent Ant ibio tic t reat men t of sus pect ed pneu mon ia (79) (71) 75(7 5)(7 8)76 (*) (*) (69) (*) (*) (82) 9092 9185 7782 per cent Ear ly m arria geW omen age d 15 49 year s m arrie d be fore ag e 15 ndnd 15nd nd0 ndnd 12nd nd1 ndnd 16nd nd1 per cent Wom en a ged 204 9 ye ars mar ried befo re age 18 ndnd 48nd nd10 ndnd 47nd nd11 ndnd 54nd nd8 per cent Youn g w omen ag ed 1 519 yea rs curr ently mar ried or in u nion ndnd 38nd nd1 ndnd 22nd nd4 ndnd 44nd nd5 per cent vIII THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Con trac eptio n an d un met ne ed Ado lesc ent birt h ra te9 ndnd 145 ndnd 8nd nd(9 4)10 ndnd 12nd nd15 9nd nd24 per 1,00 0 Ear ly c hild bear ing (at leas t on e liv e bi rth befo re a ge 1 8)11 ndnd 31nd ndnd ndnd 27nd ndnd ndnd 31nd nd3 per cent Con trac eptiv e pr eval ence rat end nd25 ndnd 46nd nd37 ndnd 40nd nd64 ndnd 61pe r ce nt Unm et n eed for cont race ptio nnd nd28 ndnd 9nd nd21 ndnd 12nd nd10 ndnd 7pe r ce nt Mat erna l and ne wbo rn h ealth Ant enat al c are cove rage At leas t on ce b y sk illed per sonn elnd nd79 ndnd 87nd nd94 ndnd 99nd nd95 ndnd 99pe r ce nt At leas t fo ur t imes by any pro vide rnd nd62 ndnd 84nd nd86 ndnd 94nd nd72 ndnd 94pe r ce nt Con tent of ante nata l ca re (b lood pre ssur e m easu red, gav e ur ine and bloo d sa mpl es) ndnd 70nd nd85 ndnd 83nd nd94 ndnd 89nd nd98 per cent Ski lled atte ndan t at de liver ynd nd99 ndnd 100 ndnd 100 ndnd 98nd nd10 0nd nd10 0pe r ce nt Inst itutio nal deliv erie snd nd99 ndnd 100 ndnd 99nd nd98 ndnd 99nd nd10 0pe r ce nt Birt hs d eliv ered by Cae sare an s ectio nnd nd13 ndnd 14nd nd13 ndnd 25nd nd14 ndnd 25pe r ce nt HIV /AID S know ledg e an d at titud es12 Wom en a ged 152 4 w ho r ecei ved HIV co unse lling dur ing ante nata l car e ndnd 2nd nd12 ndnd ndnd ndnd ndnd 4nd nd11 per cent Wom en a ged 152 4 w ho h ad a n H IV t est and wer e te sted for HIV dur ing ante nata l ca re a nd r ecei ved the resu lts ndnd 0nd nd5 ndnd ndnd ndnd ndnd 1nd nd8 per cent Wom en a nd m en aged 15 24 w ho know whe re t o be te sted for HIV 5123 nd71 70nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 3227 nd69 70nd per cent Wom en a nd m en aged 15 24 w ho have bee n te sted for HIV and kno w t he resu lts 22 nd1 0nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 31 nd2 2nd per cent Ix Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Sex ual beha viou r13 Youn g w omen and m en w ho h ave neve r ha d se x 4687 nd53 79nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 5583 nd32 48nd per cent Sex bef ore age 15 amon g w omen and m en a ged 152 4 ye ars 1412 nd2 0nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 1314 nd4 2nd per cent Age -mix ing amon g se xual par tner s (s ex with a p artn er w ho was 10 or m ore year s ol der) am ong wom en a nd m en aged 15 24 y ears 14 nd1 4nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 16 nd0 4nd per cent Toba cco use1 4To bacc o us e am ong wom en a ged 154 9 ye ars ndnd 55nd nd27 ndnd 42nd nd30 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Alc ohol use Alc ohol use am ong wom en a ged 154 9 ye ars ndnd 14nd nd18 ndnd 5nd nd3 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent Use of alco hol befo re a ge 1 5 am ong wom en a ged 154 9 ye ars ndnd 5nd nd1 ndnd 11nd nd29 ndnd ndnd ndnd per cent TH E R IGH T T O S UR vIv AL, CA RE AN D D Ev ELO PM EN T F RO M T HE EA RLI ES T P OS SIB LE A GE Chi ld deve lopm ent Att enda nce in e arly ch ildho od e duca tion 12 212 1413 71 425 1922 88 841 4744 per cent Sup port for lear ning (a ny a dult enga ged in fo ur o r m ore activ ities ) 6765 6695 9695 6855 6292 9192 6669 6796 9595 per cent Fath ers sup port fo r le arni ng (f athe r en gage d in one or mor e ac tiviti es) 6653 6074 7876 6252 5776 6671 6461 6382 7478 per cent Lear ning mat eria ls: thre e or mor e ch ildre ns book s 1111 1154 5856 2925 2753 5252 2125 2376 7676 per cent Lear ning mat eria ls: two or m ore type s of pla ythi ngs 4650 4856 5756 6065 6272 6971 5353 5466 6063 per cent Ear ly C hild hood D evel opm ent Inde x86 8485 9598 9666 7972 9393 9386 9188 9495 94pe r ce nt x THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal TH E R IGH T T O E DU CA TIO N Lite racy and ed ucat ion Lite racy rat e am ong youn g w omen and m en a ged 152 4 ye ars 9069 nd10 099 ndnd 77nd nd97 nd78 77nd 100 99nd per cent Sch ool r eadi ness 44 410 2516 (41) (32) 3633 4940 7977 7894 9997 per cent Net inta ke r ate in prim ary educ atio n40 5547 8680 83(8 1)(8 7)84 9192 9193 8991 9198 95pe r ce nt Prim ary scho ol n et atte ndan ce r atio (a djus ted) 7168 6998 9898 8686 8699 9898 9087 8998 9999 per cent Sec onda ry s choo l ne t at tend ance rat io (adj uste d) 2718 2390 9392 4435 3987 8486 2317 1988 9089 per cent Prim ary com plet ion rate 9154 7314 414 814 673 6267 103 9297 5175 6310 010 810 4pe r ce nt Tran sitio n ra te t o se cond ary scho ol(7 8)(6 2)71 9896 97(8 6)(7 4)80 9997 98(6 9)(6 7)68 9998 98pe r ce nt Gen der parit y in dex (prim ary scho ol) 7168 0.96 9898 1.00 8686 1.00 9998 1.00 9087 0.96 9899 1.01 Rat io Gen der parit y in dex (sec onda ry s choo l)27 180. 6890 931. 0344 350. 8087 840. 9623 170. 7288 901. 02R atio TH E R IGH T T O P RO TE CT ION FR OM PH YS ICA L O R M EN TAL vIO LEN CE , IN JUR Y O R A BU SE Chi ld d isci plin eV iole nt d isci plin e58 5758 6050 5581 8382 7167 6985 8786 7064 67pe r ce nt Dom estic vi olen ceA ttitu des tow ards do mes tic v iole nce amon g w omen and m en a ged 154 9 ye ars 2144 nd6 5nd nd25 ndnd 15nd nd20 ndnd 3nd per cent TH E R IGH T T O A CC ES S IN FOR MA TIO N15 Acc ess to m ass med iaE xpos ure to m ass med ia39 16nd 5644 ndnd ndnd ndnd ndnd 19nd nd58 ndpe r ce nt Use of info rmat ion and com mun icat ion tech nolo gy Use of com pute rs amon g w omen and m en a ged 152 4 ye ars 6036 nd94 93nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 6339 nd93 91nd per cent Use of Inte rnet am ong wom en a nd men age d 15 24 year s 6133 nd92 91nd ndnd ndnd ndnd 5225 nd86 85nd per cent xI Top icIn dic ato r Bo snia an d H erze govi na Th e fo rmer Yu gosl av R epu blic of Mac edo nia Ser bia Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion alR om a se ttle men tsN atio nal Ro ma sett lem ents Nat ion al Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal Mal eFe mal eTo tal TH E v IEW OF CH ILD RE N A ND YO UN G P EO PLE : SU BJE CT IvE WE LL-B EIN G Sub ject ive wel l-be ing Life sat isfa ctio n am ong wom en a nd men age d 15 24 year s 4839 nd50 54nd nd60 ndnd 69nd 5359 nd68 67nd per cent Hap pine ss a mon g w omen and men ag ed 1 524 yea rs 7775 nd91 93nd nd84 ndnd 94nd 8787 nd92 93nd per cent Perc eptio n of a bett er li fe a mon g w omen and men ag ed 1 524 yea rs 1925 nd36 33nd nd39 ndnd 55nd 2626 nd36 43nd per cent ( ) F igur es t hat are base d on 25 49 u nwei ghte d ca ses. (*) F igur es t hat are base d on few er t han 25 u nwei ghte d ca ses. xII THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN UNICEF/CEECIS2013P-0387/Piroz xIII MAP 2. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Maps of distribution of MICS samples in Roma settlements by administrative units and teams MAP 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina xIv THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN MAP 3. Serbia xv NOTES1 Detailed indicator definitions are provided in Annex A of this report. 2 MICS4 in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia did not use the Individual Mens Questionnaire. 3 The Individual Mens Questionnaire in the 2010 Serbia MICS was administered in each household to all men aged 1529 years; therefore, only those indicators for men that pertain to ages 1524 are shown in the table. 4 nd: Data not available. 5 In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Birth Registration module was only administered as part of the Roma settlement survey. 6 The Hand Washing module was not administered in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 7 MMR by 18 months of age applies for both Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. The Immunization module was not administered in Serbia. 8 Although Hib was included in the questionnaire for Bosnia and Herzegovina, because of the relatively recent introduction of this vaccination in some parts of the country, it was not included in the report. 9 Age-specific fertility rate for women age 1519 years, for the one-year period preceding the survey. 10 Figure based on 125249 person-years of exposure. 11 In Bosnia and Herzegovina, the full Child Mortality module, required to calculate indicator 5.2, was only administered within the survey of Roma settlements. 12 The HIV/AIDS module was not administered in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 13 The Sexual Behaviour module was not administered in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. 14 The Tobacco and Alcohol Use module was not administered in Serbia. 15 The Access to Mass Media and Use of Information and Communication Technology module was not administered in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. xvI THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN Foreword .......................................................................................................................................................................... iiiMaps of distribution of MICS samples in Roma settlements by administrative units and teams ................................. xivList of tables ................................................................................................................................................................... xixList of figures .................................................................................................................................................................. xxAcronyms and abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................... xxi 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................1 2 Methodology ...........................................................................................................................................................5 2.1 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys ......................................................................................................................5 2.1.1 Sample design for MICS in Roma settlements ........................................................................................5 2.1.2 Questionnaires .........................................................................................................................................6 2.1.3 Training and fieldwork ...............................................................................................................................6 2.1.4 Sample coverage ......................................................................................................................................6 2.2 Methodology of the study ...................................................................................................................................8 2.3 Structure of the study .........................................................................................................................................9 3 The women and children in the study ................................................................................................................13 3.1 Age structure and household characteristics ....................................................................................................13 3.2 The women: Age, marital status, motherhood and education ..........................................................................15 4 The right from birth to a name, a nationality and an identity ..........................................................................23 4.1 Birth registration ................................................................................................................................................23 5 The right of children to an adequate standard of living ....................................................................................27 5.1 Housing .............................................................................................................................................................27 5.2 Water and sanitation ..........................................................................................................................................28 5.2.1 Improved water sources ........................................................................................................................32 5.2.2 Improved sanitation ................................................................................................................................33 5.2.3 Hand washing ........................................................................................................................................35 5.3 Solid fuels for cooking .......................................................................................................................................35 6 The right to health ................................................................................................................................................41 6.1 Nutrition .............................................................................................................................................................41 6.1.1 Low birthweight ......................................................................................................................................41 6.1.2 Nutritional status of children ...................................................................................................................42 6.1.3 Breastfeeding and young child feeding ...................................................................................................47 6.2 Vaccinations .......................................................................................................................................................54 6.3 Prevalence and treatment of illness ..................................................................................................................55 6.3.1 Diarrhoea ................................................................................................................................................55 6.3.2 Care seeking and antibiotic treatment of pneumonia ............................................................................56 6.4 Reproductive health ..........................................................................................................................................60 6.4.1 Child marriage ........................................................................................................................................60 6.4.2 Early childbearing ...................................................................................................................................62 6.4.3 Contraception .........................................................................................................................................62 6.4.4 Antenatal care ........................................................................................................................................66 6.4.5 Assistance at delivery ............................................................................................................................67 6.4.6 Place of delivery .....................................................................................................................................67 6.4.7 HIV/AIDS ................................................................................................................................................68 6.5 Continuum of care for maternal, newborn and child health ..............................................................................72 6.6 Consumption of tobacco and alcohol ................................................................................................................76 CONTENTS xvII 7 The right to survival, care and development from the earliest possible age ..................................................83 7.1 Early childhood education and learning ..............................................................................................................83 7.2 Early childhood development index ...................................................................................................................87 8 The right to education ..........................................................................................................................................93 8.1 Literacy among young women and men ..........................................................................................................93 8.2 School readiness ...............................................................................................................................................95 8.3 Primary and secondary school participation ......................................................................................................96 9 The right to protection from physical or mental violence, injury or abuse ...................................................109 9.1 Child discipline ................................................................................................................................................109 9.2 Attitudes towards domestic violence ...............................................................................................................111 10 The right to access information ......................................................................................................................... 119 11 The right to freedom of thought and expression: Listening to childrens views ..........................................125 Annex A: MICS4 Indicators: Numerators and denominators ........................................................................................135 xvIII THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Modules of the household questionnaire......................................................................................................6Table 2.2 Modules of the womens questionnaire ........................................................................................................7Table 2.3 Modules of the mens questionnaire .............................................................................................................7Table 2.4 Modules of the childrens questionnaire........................................................................................................7Table 2.5 Results of household, women and under-five interviews .............................................................................8Table 2.6 Child rights and corresponding articles of international human rights instruments, Millennium Development Goals and the European Union Charter ..................................................................................9Table 3.1 Household composition...............................................................................................................................15Table 3.2 Womens background characteristics ..........................................................................................................17Table 3.3 Background characteristics of children under 5 years of age ......................................................................18Table 3.4 Childrens living arrangements and orphanhood .........................................................................................19Table 4.1 Birth registration ..........................................................................................................................................24Table 5.1 Characteristics of dwellings ........................................................................................................................28Table 5.2 Household possessions ..............................................................................................................................29Table 5.3 Wealth quintiles ...........................................................................................................................................29Table 5.4 Use of improved drinking-water sources ....................................................................................................33Table 5.5 Use of improved sanitation .........................................................................................................................34Table 5.6 Improved water source and improved sanitation ........................................................................................35Table 5.7 Hand washing ..............................................................................................................................................38Table 5.8 Hand washing and water sources ...............................................................................................................38Table 5.9 Solid fuel use ...............................................................................................................................................39Table 6.1 Nutritional status of children: Underweight ................................................................................................43Table 6.2 Nutritional status of children: Stunting ........................................................................................................44Table 6.3 Nutritional status of children: Wasting .........................................................................................................45Table 6.4 Comparison of anthropometric indicators between Roma children and national averages ........................45Table 6.5 Initial breastfeeding .....................................................................................................................................46Table 6.6 Duration of breastfeeding ............................................................................................................................48Table 6.7 Age-appropriate breastfeeding ....................................................................................................................49Table 6.8 Minimum meal frequency ...........................................................................................................................49Table 6.9 Bottle-feeding ..............................................................................................................................................50Table 6.10 Vaccinations .................................................................................................................................................54Table 6.11 Oral rehydration solutions and recommended homemade fluids ...............................................................55Table 6.12 Drinking practices during diarrhoea .............................................................................................................55Table 6.13 Eating practices during diarrhoea ................................................................................................................56Table 6.14 Knowledge of the two danger signs of pneumonia ....................................................................................57Table 6.15 Child marriage .............................................................................................................................................61Table 6.16 Adolescent birth rate and total fertility rate .................................................................................................62Table 6.17 Early childbearing .........................................................................................................................................63Table 6.18 Trends in early childbearing .........................................................................................................................63Table 6.19 Use of contraception ...................................................................................................................................64Table 6.20 Unmet need for contraception ....................................................................................................................65Table 6.21 Antenatal care provider ...............................................................................................................................66Table 6.22 Number of antenatal care visits ..................................................................................................................67Table 6.23 Assistance during delivery ..........................................................................................................................69Table 6.24 HIV counselling and testing during antenatal care ......................................................................................69Table 6.25 Knowledge of a place for HIV testing ..........................................................................................................70Table 6.26 Sexual behaviour that increases the risk of HIV infection ...........................................................................71Table 6.27 Tobacco use .................................................................................................................................................77Table 6.28 Use of alcohol ..............................................................................................................................................78Table 7.1 Early childhood education ............................................................................................................................84Table 7.2 Support for learning .....................................................................................................................................85Table 7.3 Learning materials .......................................................................................................................................86Table 7.4 Early Childhood Development Index ...........................................................................................................87Table 7.5 Differences in Early Childhood Development Index ....................................................................................88Table 7.6 Nutritional status and Early Childhood Development Index ........................................................................88 xIx Table 7.7 Tests of significance for difference of means between literacy-numeracy and Early Childhood Development Index ...........................................................................................................91 Table 8.1 Literacy among young women ....................................................................................................................94Table 8.2 Literacy among young men .........................................................................................................................94Table 8.3 School readiness .........................................................................................................................................96Table 8.4 Primary school entry ....................................................................................................................................97Table 8.5 Primary school attendance ........................................................................................................................102Table 8.6 Secondary school attendance ...................................................................................................................103Table 8.7 Primary school completion and transition to secondary school ................................................................103Table 8.8 Education gender parity ............................................................................................................................104Table 9.1 Child discipline ........................................................................................................................................... 110Table 9.2 Attitudes towards physical punishment .....................................................................................................111Table 9.3 Attitudes towards domestic violence: Women.......................................................................................... 112Table 9.4 Attitudes towards domestic violence: Men ............................................................................................... 114Table 10.1 Exposure to mass media ...........................................................................................................................120Table 10.2 Use of computers and Internet .................................................................................................................121Table 11.1 Domains of life satisfaction: Women .........................................................................................................126Table 11.2 Domains of life satisfaction: Men ..............................................................................................................128Table 11.3 Happiness ..................................................................................................................................................129Table 11.4 Perception of a better life ..........................................................................................................................130 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1 Age and sex distribution of population ........................................................................................................14Figure 3.2 Education level of mothers of children under 5 years of age ......................................................................18Figure 5.1 Distribution of household population with piped water in the dwelling by wealth quintiles .......................34Figure 6.1 Proportion of infants weighing less than 2,500 grams at birth ...................................................................42Figure 6.2 Children under 5 years of age who are stunted in Roma settlements ........................................................46Figure 6.3 Mothers who started breastfeeding within one hour and within one day of birth......................................47Figure 6.4 Infant feeding patterns by age, Serbia .........................................................................................................51Figure 6.5 Infant feeding patterns by age in Roma settlements, Serbia ......................................................................51Figure 6.6 Proportion of children under 5 years of age with diarrhoea who received ORT or increased fluids and continued feeding .................................................................................................................................56Figure 6.7 Coverage of interventions across the continuum of care in Roma settlements, Bosnia and Herzegovina ..............................................................................................................................72Figure 6.8 Coverage of interventions across the continuum of care in Roma settlements, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia .................................................................................................................73Figure 6.9 Coverage of interventions across the continuum of care in Roma settlements, Serbia .............................73Figure 7.1 Literacy-numeracy by support for learning and learning materials ..............................................................89Figure 7.2 Early Childhood Development Index by support for learning and learning materials ..................................91Figure 8.1 Literacy by wealth .......................................................................................................................................95Figure 8.2 Household members aged 524 years attending school, by gender, in Bosnia and Herzegovina ............105Figure 8.3 Household members aged between 524 years attending school, by gender, in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia ...................................................................................................105Figure 8.4 Household members aged 524 years attending school, by gender, in Serbia.........................................106 xx THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN AIDS Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromeBIH Bosnia and HerzegovinaCEDAW Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women CEE/CIS Central and Eastern Europe/Commonwealth of Independent StatesCERD Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial DiscriminationCOE Council of EuropeCRC Convention on the Rights of the ChildCRPD Convention on the Rights of Persons with DisabilitiesDEC Development and Education Centres (Serbia) ECD early child developmentECDI Early Childhood Development IndexECHR European Convention on Human RightsEU European UnionFYROM The former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaGDP gross domestic product GPI gender parity indexICCPR International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsICESCR International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ICT Information and communication technologyIECD Integrated Early Childhood Development (Centres)MDG Millennium Development Goal (initiative of the United Nations)MICS Multiple Indicator Cluster SurveysNAR net attendance ratioNGO non-governmental organizations OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentORS oral rehydration solutionORT oral rehydration treatmentPPP Preparatory Preschool Programme (Serbia) REA Roma education assistants (Serbia) REP Roma Education Programme (The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia)RHF Recommended home fluidRTA Roma teaching assistants (Serbia) SRB SerbiaUN United NationsUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUNICEF United Nations Childrens FundWHO World Health Organization ACRONYMS AND ABBREvIATIONS xxI This study aims to support duty bearers in meeting their obligations, and all children particularly Roma children in claiming their rights. xxII THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN UNICEF/CEECIS2013P-0345/Piroz xxIII INTRODUCTION / THE RIGHTS OF ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN and young people are necessary to contribute to the overarching objectives of social cohesion and sustainable development enshrined in the Europe 2020 Strategy. All countries in Europe have formally committed to protecting and promoting the rights of children, identified primarily in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and reinforced in the A World Fit for Children commitments and in all other human rights conventions, in particular the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (CERD), the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). At the regional level, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) enshrines and protects human rights and fundamental freedoms in 47 States parties, all members of the COE. Furthermore, since 2009, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (EU Charter) binds all EU institutions and member States when they act within the scope of EU law (i.e., when they implement EU legislation domestically, to respect and promote the rights, freedoms and principles set out for all EU citizens and residents). The CRC is a universally agreed-upon set of non-negotiable standards and obligations establishing minimum entitlements and freedoms for all children that should be respected by States parties. These rights are founded on respect for the dignity and worth of each individual, regardless of race, colour, gender, language, religion, opinions, origins, wealth, birth status or ability, and they apply to every human being. With rights comes the obligation on the part of governments and individuals not to infringe upon the parallel rights of others. The human rights of children are both interdependent and indivisible. Achieving
Report
01 Январь 2014
Realizing the rights of Roma children and women in three countries
https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/realizing-rights-roma-children-and-women-three-countries
1 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Introduction Across Europe, many Roma boys and girls, young men and women experience extreme poverty, social exclusion and discrimination. They are disadvantaged and marginalised through not being registered, low levels of parental education, low participation in early childhood care and education at all levels, and limited access to health care services, employment, water and sanitation and social services. Their exclusion is often driven by poverty, limited opportunities for participation in decisions affecting their lives, discrimination in the labour market, in public services and in society, spatial segregation, and lack of sustainable well-funded policies to change the course of these trends. The lack of information on Roma communities, especially children, young people and women, hinders the development of effective social inclusion policies. In response, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia are taking crucial steps to end Roma exclusion, by monitoring progress and developing policies to prevent discrimination. These bold initiatives set a valuable example for other countries to follow. Drawing on these efforts, the UNICEF Regional Office for Central and Eastern Europe/Commonwealth of Independent States (CEE/CIS) has produced a study on the situation of Roma children and women in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia to find out how Roma children fare in comparison to non-Roma and where positive progress has been made in social inclusion. This study fills a major gap in available research and disaggregated data on Roma children, young people and women. Improving Roma lives requires a human rights-based approach. All countries in Europe have formally committed to protecting and promoting the rights of all children and women, identified in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), and reinforced in the United Nations General Assemblys A World Fit for Children commitments and other human rights conventions, in particular the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). The study aims to support duty-bearers governments, civil society and individuals in meeting their obligations, and all children and women particularly Roma children and women to claim their rights. Realizing the rights of Roma children and womenin Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and SerbiaSummary analysis of key findings from MICS surveys in Roma settlements in the three countries INSIGHTS: CHILD RIGHTS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA ISSUE 2 / 2014 2 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 1. Birth registration: a ticket to life that all Roma children must get Every child has the right to a name, a nationality and an identity (CRC Articles 7 and 8). Birth registration for every child at or shortly after birth is the means of securing these rights. The lack of birth registration denies Roma children the chance of participating in vaccination programmes and having regular health check-ups, and hinders access to early childhood development services, education and social benefits. The study assesses the situation of Roma children and women across the main areas of social inclusion, corresponding to the key rights enshrined in the CRC: birth registration, participation in early childhood care and development, access to health care services, access to education at all levels, living standards, child protection and access to information. This edition of Insights presents the key findings for some of these topics. More details can be found in the full report of the study. Based on the results of this research, UNICEF recommends the following priority actions: Address malnutrition affecting young Roma children during their first two years of life; Expand supply of quality inclusive early childhood education and learning for children between 3 years and compulsory school age, and family support services to encourage equally shared parenting; Improve the quality and inclusiveness of primary and secondary education, particularly for Roma girls and women; Secure for Roma girls and women access to quality inclusive health care services and information; and Address the material deprivation and income poverty of Roma households, in particular of Roma women. Study methodology The study is based on data from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) carried out in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2011-2012), the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (2011), and Serbia (2010). The MICS provide information on the situation of children, women and men, focusing mainly on health, education, child development and child protection. The MICS enable monitoring of progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and are comparable internationally. The study mainly uses MICS data from Roma settlements which are compared with national averages. The term non-Roma in this brief is used interchangeably with national average and nationally, considering the very low proportion of Roma in the national population of each of the three countries. UNICEF CEECIS/2011/Mcconnico Organized services for the early ages can enable mothers, fathers and other carers to pursue personal and societal goals. 4 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 2. Early childhood development: a life-long investment for every Roma child Every child has the right to life and the best possible health (CRC Articles 6, 18 and 24). Governments must ensure that Roma children survive and thrive by providing services to support both mothers and fathers in caring for and raising their children. Exposure to risk factors, such as poverty and non-stimulating environments, in the early years can have lifelong consequences. From pre-natal to 3 years of age, emotions are shaped, physical health established and social skills and cognitive-linguistic capacities developed. Appropriate attention to ECD can help to prevent social exclusion and poverty before it starts by ensuring that all children have the best possible nurturing and responsive care and protection from birth. Access to early childhood education services is essential in providing all children, and particularly the most disadvantaged, an even start as they enter primary school. Organised care services can also enable mothers, fathers and other carers to pursue personal and societal goals in the education system, labour market and community.The engagement of both mothers and fathers in activities with children such as, reading books to infants promotes language and cognitive skills. The Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) represents the proportion of children who are developmentally on track in at least three of four principal developmental domains: physical growth, literacy and numeracy skills, social-emotional development and readiness to learn. Key Findings. Over 98 per cent of Roma children under 5 years of age are registered in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia, and just below 96 per cent in Bosnia and Herzegovina. But this leaves 2-4 per cent who are not. Delays in birth registration are common: in Bosnia and Herzegovina only 91 per cent of children under 1 year of age are registered. A high proportion of Roma mothers who say registration has taken place are unable to produce a birth certificate (more commonly in the poorest households): from 20 per cent in Bosnia and Herzegovina to over 35 per cent in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia. The mothers education and household wealth can determine whether a child has a birth certificate: in Serbia, 14 per cent of Roma children of mothers without education and 15 per cent of children in the poorest households do not have a birth certificate. INSIGHTS 5 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Key Findings. Roma childrens life chances are threatened from an early age, due to limited early development opportunities: There are few children who participate in early childhood education in the three countries, even fewer Roma: in Bosnia and Herzegovina, less than 2 per cent of Roma children aged 3 to 4 years attend (13 per cent nationally), in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 4 per cent and in Serbia 8 per cent (22 and 44 per cent nationally, respectively). Household wealth and parents education affect attendance: in Serbia, one in four Roma children whose mother attended secondary school or higher and only 6 per cent of children whose mothers received no education, attend early education. Roma young boys are slightly more likely to attend early childhood education than young girls in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, while there is no observed gender difference in the other two countries. Roma children aged 3 to 4 years have less interaction with parents than non-Roma children: less than 70 per cent of Roma parents engage with their children in all countries (over 90 per cent among non-Roma). Fathers engagement is also lower among the Roma than non-Roma. When the mother has at least primary education, the rate is higher: over 70 per cent in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia compared to 50 per cent or below without education. Roma children under 5 years of age have less access to books than non-Roma children: only one in ten Roma households in Bosnia and Herzegovina has at least three childrens books and less than one in four in the other countries (compared to over half in national samples and 76 per cent in Serbia). Wealth and education levels are crucial: the poorest Roma households in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia are about seven times less likely to have books than the wealthiest (2 to 16 per cent and 8 to 49 per cent respectively). Roma young children aged 3 to 4 years score lower on the Early Childhood Development Index (ECDI) than non-Roma: from 72 per cent (the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) and 88 per cent (Serbia) to 93 and 96 per cent for non-Roma, respectively (Figure 1). Roma young girls score higher than boys in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (79 and 66 per cent respectively) while there is no or a very small difference in the other two countries. A significant correlation between stunting and ECDI exists among Roma children in Serbia. Physical growth and learning indicators are high among Roma children, but literacy and numeracy are much lower than among non-Roma children: about 98 per cent of Roma children aged from 3 to 4 years are on target physically and over 90 per cent on target for learning in all countries. Literacy-numeracy levels of Roma children are low, one-third the rate of non-Roma children. In the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma girls have a lower score than boys in literacy-numeracy (12 and 19 per cent). In all countries there is no significant difference between Roma boys and girls in physical growth and learning indicators. 6 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 3. Health: securing a virtuous cycle of good health for Roma children and mothers Every child has the right to the best possible health and the CRC requires States to ensure that no child is deprived of the right of access health care services. (CRC Article 24). The cycle of deprivation for a disadvantaged child begins with the mothers poor health and nutrition, which can determine the health at birth of the child and the environment in which the child grows up. Governments can end this cycle by providing quality health care, services to prevent malnutrition, clean water and a clean environment for all families throughout their lives. 3.1 Reproductive health All women have the right to access health care services, including those related to reproductive health, throughout their lives (CEDAW Article 12). The CEDAW (Article 16) also requires States to ensure that women and men have the same right to enter into marriage with free and full consent, to freely choose a spouse, and to decide freely and responsibly on the number and spacing of children, including access to the information, education and means to enable such choices. Early marriage and early childbearing can be an underlying cause of poor health among women and children, which may also hamper attendance to school. A lack of proof of age, the lack or lax enforcement of laws on child marriage, and customs and religious practices put children at risk of early marriage. The age at which girls and boys become sexually active also carries health risks. Pregnancy-related deaths are the leading cause of mortality among 15 to 19-year-old Figure 1. Differences in 4 components of early childhood development index (ECDI) between Roma and non-Roma children (per cent of children age 36-59 months who are developmentally on track in literacy-numeracy, physical, social-emotional, and learning domains) 100 90 Per cent Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements Bosnia and Herzegovina The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma Settlements The former YugoslavRepublic of Macedonia Serbia Roma Settlements Serbia 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Lite racy -nu mer acy Phys ical Soci al-e mot iona lLe arni ngEC DI Lite racy -nu mer acy Phys ical Soci al-e mot iona lLe arni ngEC DI Lite racy -nu mer acy Phys ical Soci al-e mot iona lLe arni ngEC DI Lite racy -nu mer acy Phys ical Soci al-e mot iona lLe arni ngEC DI Lite racy -nu mer acy Phys ical Soci al-e mot iona lLe arni ngEC DI Lite racy -nu mer acy Phys ical Soci al-e mot iona lLe arni ngEC DI 8 98 86 99 85 25 100 95 99 96 16 98 72 92 72 43 100 91 99 93 11 99 89 98 88 31 100 94 99 94 Whiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. INSIGHTS 7 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis girls worldwide and those under 15 years are five times more likely to die than women in their twenties. If a mother is under 18 years, her babys chances of dying in the first year of life are 60 per cent higher than for a baby born to an older mother. The risk of maternal mortality is high during labour and delivery in the antenatal period and also in the delivery and in the immediate post-partum period. The place of delivery, hygienic conditions and medical attention from skilled staff during delivery are critical in reducing risks. Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to HIV because of their age, biology and, often, legal status. They must know where to be tested for HIV, what their HIV status is and how to seek treatment. Antenatal care is a crucial opportunity for HIV prevention and care, in particular for HIV transmission from mother to child. Key Findings. Roma women and girls are more vulnerable to reproductive health issues than non-Roma. Significant improvements have been made in terms of birth delivered at public health facilities which are assisted by skilled attendants. Roma women are more likely to be married before the age of 15 years than non-Roma women and Roma men: 15-16 per cent of Roma women aged 15-49 years in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia and 12 per cent in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia were married before age 15, compared to around 1 per cent nationally. Half of Roma women aged 20-24 years are married before the age of 18 years in all countries (compared to around 10 per cent nationally). Early marriage is more common for women with a low level of education and from the poorest households. Roma women are much more likely to be married before age 15 or 18 than Roma men in all three countries. Early childbearing is more frequent among Roma girls: 40 per cent of 15 to 19-year-olds Roma girls in Serbia had a live birth or were pregnant with a first child, but only 4 per cent among non-Roma (31 of Roma women in Bosnia and Herzegovina; and 18 in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). Roma women with no education have the highest rate: almost half of women in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia have had a live birth, compared with 6 per cent with secondary education or higher in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 15 per cent in Serbia. Roma women are less likely to receive HIV counselling and to be offered HIV testing as part of antenatal care than non-Roma women: 2 per cent of Roma women aged 15-24 years who gave birth in the previous two years in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 4 per cent in Serbia received HIV counselling during antenatal care (above 11 per cent nationally in both countries). No Roma women in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 1 per cent of Roma women in Serbia were offered an HIV test, were tested for HIV and received the results during antenatal care (compared to 5 per cent in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 8 per cent in Serbia nationally). Knowledge on places where HIV tests can be carried out is lower among Roma than non-Roma, with wider knowledge among Roma men than Roma women: 23 per cent of Roma women aged 15-24 years in Bosnia and Herzegovina, and 27 per cent in Serbia know about a place to get tested, compared to 70 per cent nationally in both countries. 8 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Differences exist also between Roma and non-Roma men: around 70 per cent of men nationally in both countries know a place to get tested compared to 51 per cent of Roma men in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 32 per cent in Serbia. For both Roma women and men the level of knowledge is especially low among the poorest and those who have no education: Roma women with no education and those from the poorest households have the lowest levels of knowledge. The use of modern methods of contraception is low among married Roma women aged 15-49 years in all countries: Serbia has the lowest, at 6 per cent (22 per cent nationally). The proportion of Roma women who use any method of contraception is lowest in Bosnia and Herzegovina at 25 per cent (46 nationally). Unmet need is also higher among Roma women (28 per cent in Bosnia and Herzegovina: three times the national average of 9 per cent). Roma women are less likely to receive antenatal care visits by skilled personnel in all countries (Figure 2): only 62 per cent of Roma women in Bosnia and Herzegovina who gave birth during the two years preceding the survey received the minimum number of four visits (84 per cent nationally), with 86 per cent in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (94 per cent nationally). The educational level of mothers is linked, as is wealth status of the household. There are no differences between Roma and non-Roma in terms of the place of delivery and presence of a skilled attendant: 99 per cent of births took place in a public health facility with a skilled attendant in all three countries for Roma and non-Roma alike. 100 90 Per cent 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements 21 Wom en w ho h adno ant enat alca re v isits Wom en w ho h ad4 or m ore visi ts Bosnia and Herzegovina Wom en w ho h ad4 or m ore visi ts Wom en w ho h adno ant enat alca re v isits The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma Settlements Wom en w ho h adno ant enat alca re v isits Wom en w ho h ad4 or m ore visi ts The former YugoslavRepublic of Macedonia Wom en w ho h ad4 or m ore visi ts Wom en w ho h adno ant enat alca re v isits Serbia Roma Settlements Wom en w ho h adno ant enat alca re v isits Wom en w ho h ad4 or m ore visi ts Serbia Wom en w ho h ad4 or m ore visi ts Wom en w ho h adno ant enat alca re v isits 62 136 16 72 1 8694 94 84 Figure 2. Differences in antenatal care coverage between Roma and non-Roma women (per cent of women aged 15-49 years who had a live birth during the previous two years, by number of antenatal care visits by any provider) Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. INSIGHTS 9 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 3.2 Nutrition A newborns weight at birth is a good indicator of a mothers health and nutritional status as well as of her or his chances for survival, growth, long-term health and psychosocial development. Low birth weight is a significant risk factor and is associated with poor child development outcomes. Breastfeeding for the first few years of life protects children from infection, helps growth and provides an ideal source of nutrients; stopping breastfeeding too soon might entail severe consequences for the child. Undernourished children are more likely to die from common childhood ailments and have faltering growth. Stunting reflects chronic malnutrition and, if not treated during the first two years of life, the impact on physical and cognitive development is largely irreversible. Wasting is usually the result of a recent nutritional deficiency. Figure 3. Differences in weight at birth (per cent of last live-born children in the last two years weighing less than 2500 grams at birth) Whiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. 18 Per cent 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements Bosnia andHerzegovina The formerYugoslav Republic ofMacedonia RomaSettlements The formerYugoslav Republic ofMacedonia SerbiaRoma Settlements Serbia 14 3 11 6 10 5 Key Findings. Disparities exist in nutrition between Roma and non-Roma children, with differences between girls and boys in the case of meal frequency, but there are positive indicators on breastfeeding: Roma infants are more likely to have low birth weight than non-Roma in all countries (above 10 per cent, Figure 3): in Bosnia and Herzegovina the proportion of low birth weight Roma infants is over four times that of non-Roma (14 per cent compared to 3 per cent). Household wealth is a determining factor. Roma children under 5 years of age are more likely to be underweight, wasted and stunted than non-Roma children in all countries (Figure 4): the proportion of underweight Roma children is more than four times higher than non-Roma in all three countries. One in five Roma children in Bosnia and Herzegovina and one in four in Serbia are moderately or severely stunted (less than one in ten nationally). The proportion of wasted children is higher among Roma children and highest in Bosnia and Herzegovina, affecting one in five 6-11 months-old infants. A mothers education and household wealth is linked to underweight children, and wealth also to stunting. The proportion of Roma babies being breastfed for the first time within one hour of birth is low, but higher than nationally in all three countries: half of Roma babies in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 39 per cent in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia but 10 per cent in Serbia. The proportion of Roma children breastfed within one hour is higher 10 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis in all countries than nationally. Similarly differences are observed with breastfeeding within one day (apart from Bosnia and Herzegovina where Roma and non-Roma are almost the same) and duration of breastfeeding. Roma children are exclusively breastfed more commonly than non-Roma in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and predominant breastfeeding is more prevalent in all countries. Continued breastfeeding at 1 year of age is higher for Roma children in all three countries, as is breastfeeding up to 2 years of age: 40 per cent are appropriately breastfed for their age compared to 18 per cent nationally in Bosnia and Herzegovina and 43 per cent compared to 22 per cent in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. The proportion of Roma children aged 6-23 months receiving the minimum number of recommended meals per day is lower than national averages: 60 per cent (72 per cent nationally) and 72 per cent (84 per cent nationally) of Roma children in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia, respectively, were getting meals the minimum number of recommended times. Gender inequalities in minimum meal frequency are high in Roma settlements in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia where only 56 per cent of Roma girls were achieving the minimum meal frequency compared to 69 per cent of Roma boys (gender inequalities are similarly observed at the national level). Figure 4. Comparison of anthropometric indicators between Roma and non-Roma children (per cent of underweight, stunted, wasted and overweight children under the age of 5) Whiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. Per cent Bosnia andHerzegovina Roma Settlements Bosnia andHerzegovina The formerYugoslav Republic of MacedoniaRoma Settlements The formerYugoslav Republic of Macedonia SerbiaRoma Settlements Serbia Und erw eigh tSt unte dW aste dO verw eigh t Und erw eigh tSt unte dW aste dO verw eigh t Und erw eigh tSt unte dW aste dO verw eigh t Und erw eigh tSt unte dW aste dO verw eigh t Und erw eigh tSt unte dW aste dO verw eigh t Und erw eigh tSt unte dW aste dO verw eigh t 30 25 20 15 10 5 09 21 8 8 29 2 17 8 17 5 51 5 2 12 7 5 13242 7 4 16 UNICEF CEECIS/2011/Mcconnico Educated, informed and healthy girls and women are empowered to pursue their goals, transform their families and communities. 12 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 3.3 Child health As children grow up, many die unnecessarily due to a lack of immunization and prevention/treatment of pneumonia and diarrhoea. Pneumonia is the leading cause of death in children and diarrhoea the second leading cause of death among children under 5 years of age worldwide. Both can be prevented or treated. 3.4 Continuum of care The concept of continuum of care is an integrated approach recognising that the health and well-being of women, newborns and children are closely linked and should be managed in a unified way. The concept promotes care for mothers and children from pregnancy to delivery, in the immediate postnatal period and into childhood, recognising that safe childbirth is critical to the health of both the mother and child. It focuses particularly on the highly vulnerable maternal, newborn and child health periods. Key Findings. Roma children, equally girls and boys, do not receive adequate disease prevention and treatment services: Roma children aged 18-29 months are less likely to be immunized than non-Roma children in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (data not collected for Serbia). Coverage tends to decrease for the second and third dose of all repetitive vaccinations. In Bosnia and Herzegovina only 4 per cent of Roma children had all the recommended vaccinations, compared with 68 per cent among non-Roma children. Diarrhoea is more common among Roma children in all countries: 13-15 per cent of Roma children under 5 experienced diarrhoea (within two weeks prior to the survey and as reported by mothers) compared to 6-8 per cent for non-Roma. Treatment differs, with Roma children given less to drink during diarrhoea, most strikingly in Bosnia and Herzegovina with 64 per cent for Roma and 16 per cent for non-Roma. Roma children also receive less food afterwards and less oral rehydration treatment. Roma mothers are less likely to recognise the danger signs of pneumonia in all countries: knowledge is highest in Serbia (16 per cent of Roma mothers recognised the signs compared to 26 per cent nationally) and lowest in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (3 per cent compared to 6 per cent nationally). INSIGHTS 13 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Key Findings. The majority of Roma and non-Roma children and mothers are well covered with skilled attendance at delivery and improved water sources and sanitation (Figure 5), however, For Roma women and children the most important gaps in coverage are in the pre-pregnancy, postnatal and infancy periods: The pre-pregnancy period is marked by low contraceptive prevalence rates both for Roma and non-Roma women while Roma children are slightly better off in terms of exclusive breastfeeding and complementary feeding. The most important disparities between Roma and non-Roma across the continuum of health care are seen in antenatal care and immunisation coverage: these gaps are considerable in Bosnia and Herzegovina compared to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia. Figure 5. Coverage of interventions across the continuum of care in Roma settlements Note: Arrow heads are data points representing national figures.Whiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma Settlements Serbia Roma Settlements Pre-pregnancy Pregnancy Birth Postnatal Infancy Childhood Con trace ptiv e pr eval ence rate At l east one ant enat al v isit At l east four ant enat al v isits Ski lled atte ndan t at d eliv ery Ear ly in itiat ion of b reas tfeed ing Exc lusi ve b reas tfeed ing Com plem enta ry fe edin g Mea sles imm unis atio n DP T3 im mun isat ion Car esee king for p neum onia Ant ibio tics for p neum onia Dia rrho ea tr eatm ent Impr oved san itatio n fa cilit ies Impr oved drin king wat er 100 90 Per cent 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 no d ata colle cted no d ata colle cted 25 37 64 79 94 95 62 86 72 62 100 100 50 39 10 22 32 9 46 46 41 80 76 92 75 69 91 52 53 60 73 91 85 97 99 9813 7822 89 14 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 4. Education: harnessing the greatest opportunity to transform a Roma childs life A childs right to education is based on equal opportunity and aims at promoting the fullest possible development of all girls and boys, without discrimination on any ground. (CRC Article 28). Education equips girls and boys, women and men with the qualifications and skills needed for a self-sufficient, productive and satisfactory life. It is a vital prerequisite for combating poverty, realizing human rights and democracy, promoting gender equality, and protecting the environment. All children must be able to realise their right through access to quality education and to be treated with respect at school. Girl and boys can be restricted from attending school due to segregation, language barriers, distance from school, lack of identity papers, and lack of money to pay for school clothes and equipment and fear of stigma. Limited access to education can often begin at the pre-school stage and then continue throughout a childs school years. 4.1 School readiness Quality pre-school education is important for childrens development and to prepare them for formal school education (see Section 2). Even when pre-schools are available, take-up can often be limited due to lack of transport from remote settlements or unaffordable costs. 4.2 Primary and secondary school participation For children who have limited access to education from the pre-school level onwards, making the transition to the next level can be challenging. Even when enrolled disadvantaged children risk having to endure poor quality, under-resourced, segregated facilities, with a curriculum that does not recognise or promote multiple languages and cultures, and discrimination from peers and teachers. Early marriage and childbirth can curtail opportunities for girls. Key findings. Access of Roma to pre-school education largely depends on the national pre-school system: The proportion of Roma children attending first grade of primary school who had attended pre-school is very low: in Bosnia and Herzegovina only 4 per cent currently attending first grade attended pre-school the previous year (16 per cent nationally). The highest attendance levels for Roma are in Serbia at 78 per cent (97 per cent nationally), where one pre-primary year is compulsory, free of charge and available country-wide. There were no observed differences between girls and boys in the three countries. INSIGHTS 15 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Key findings. The lack of access to education for Roma children continues at all levels, with lower participation rates for Roma girls from age 12 onwards: Roma children of primary school age are less likely to enter the first grade of primary school than non-Roma children: in Bosnia and Herzegovina only 47 per cent enter the first grade (83 per cent nationally), while the figure is 84 per cent (91 per cent nationally) in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and 91 per cent (95 per cent nationally) in Serbia. However, the proportion of female children who enter the first grade in Bosnia and Herzegovina is higher than that of males. Fewer Roma children attend primary school than non-Roma children: in Bosnia and Herzegovina only 69 per cent; in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 86 per cent, and in Serbia, 89 per cent (compared to around 98 per cent nationally in all three countries). Roma children are less likely to complete primary school than non-Roma (Figure 6): around two-thirds of Roma children complete primary school in all countries (around 100 per cent nationally), while the transition rate is 80 per cent or less in all (over 97 per cent nationally). Fewer Roma children attend secondary school than non-Roma children: in Serbia only 19 per cent (compared to 89 per cent of non-Roma children); in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 23 per cent (compared to 92 per cent), and in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, 39 per cent (compared to 86 per cent). Attendance among Roma boys is higher than Roma girls in secondary school (Figure 7): while Roma boys and girls attending primary school in equal numbers, in all countries a gender gap emerges after the age of 12 and gets irreversibly wider from age 15. Such gender inequalities are not seen nationally. Figure 6. Primary school completion and transition to secondary school Whiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. 160 140 Per cent 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements Prim ary scho olco mpl etio n ra teTr ansi tion rate tose cond ary scho ol Bosnia and Herzegovina Tran sitio n ra te to seco ndar y sc hool Prim ary scho olco mpl etio n ra te The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma Settlements Prim ary scho olco mpl etio n ra teTr ansi tion rate tose cond ary scho ol The former YugoslavRepublic of Macedonia Tran sitio n ra te to seco ndar y sc hool Prim ary scho olco mpl etio n ra te Serbia Roma Settlements Prim ary scho olco mpl etio n ra teTr ansi tion rate tose cond ary scho ol Serbia Tran sitio n ra te to seco ndar y sc hool Prim ary scho olco mpl etio n ra te 71 146 67 97 6368 104 80 98 9897 73 16 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Figure 7. Education gender parity in secondary school (ratio of adjusted net attendance ratios of girls to boys) NAR: net attendance ratioWhiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. 100 90 Per cent 80 70 60 50 40 20 30 10 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Girl sSe cond ary scho ol adju sted NAR : Boy s Bosnia and Herzegovina Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Boy s Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Girl s The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma Settlements Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Girl sSe cond ary scho ol adju sted NAR : Boy s The former YugoslavRepublic of Macedonia Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Boy s Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted net atte ndan cera tio: G irls Serbia Roma Settlements Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Girl sSe cond ary scho ol adju sted NAR : Boy s Serbia Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Boy s Seco ndar y sc hool adju sted NAR : Girl s 27 93 35 84 17 23 9044 87 889018 4.3 Literacy among young women and men Literacy is a fundamental human right of women and men, the foundation for lifelong learning and an instrument of empowerment to improve ones health, well-being, income and relationship with wider society. For women in particular, literacy is essential to bolstering their productive, entrepreneurial, community and societal roles. The education and literacy levels of parents, mothers in particular, determine a childs survival, growth and development prospects. Key findings. Young Roma women are more likely to have lower literacy rates than young Roma men and non-Roma: Roma women have lower literacy levels than non-Roma women: less than 80 per cent of Roma women aged 15-24 are literate in all countries (compared with almost 100 per cent nationally). Bosnia and Herzegovina has the lowest rate at 69 per cent. Literacy is much higher among men, both Roma and non-Roma. The majority of young Roma women with no education are illiterate: over 80 per cent in all countries. Wealth status plays a key role in literacy (Figure 8): only half of Roma women in the poorest households in all countries are literate, compared to around 90 per cent of the richest. However, literacy rates for Roma women from the richest quintiles are still lower than the female and male literacy rates nationally. INSIGHTS 17 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis 5. Living standards: improving the conditions in which Roma children grow up All children need a standard of living adequate for their physical, mental, spiritual, moral and social development, and have a right to access to clean drinking water (CRC article 27 and 24). The CRC establishes the primary responsibility of parents or other formal carers, but with a clear accountability of States to provide assistance where adequate standards cannot be met by primary carers solely. Lower income levels, substandard housing and a lack of access to basic services, such as water, sanitation and safe cooking fuels can increase the risk of ill-health, especially of children and women, and a lack of a permanent home and address can mean administrative exclusion from health care. Although access to safe drinking water, water resources and sanitation facilities have improved in all three countries, the threat of waterborne diseases and contamination from unsafe drinking sources remains. Inadequate disposal of human excreta and personal hygiene can result in a variety of diseases including diarrhoea (see Section 3.3). Hand washing with water and soap is the most cost effective action to prevent diarrhoea and pneumonia in children under 5 years of age. Solid fuels wood, crops, agricultural waste, animal dung and coal when used for cooking and heating create indoor smoke and increase, for girls, boys, women and men in the household, the risk of acute respiratory illness, pneumonia, chronic obstructive lung disease, cancer, and possibly tuberculosis, asthma or cataracts, and may also lead to low birth weight of babies of pregnant women. Figure 8. Literacy by wealth and sex (per cent of the literate among women aged 15-24 by wealth quintiles and sex in Roma settlements and by sex nationally) Whiskers indicate the 95 per cent confidence interval.Source: UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS, The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, forthcoming in 2014. 100 90 Per cent 80 70 60 50 40 20 30 10 0 Bosnia and Herzegovina Roma Settlements Wealth index quintiles Wealth index quintiles Wealth index quintiles Sex Bosnia and Herzegovina The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Roma Settlements The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Serbia Roma Settlements Serbia 77 9750P oore st Sex 90M ale 69Fe mal e 99M ale 99Fe mal e Sex Sex 78M ale 77Fe mal e 100 Mal e 99Fe mal e Sex Sex Mal e Fem ale Mal e Fem ale 62S econ d 69Th ird 79Fo urth 86R iche st 54P oore st 73S econ d 83Th ird 81Fo urth 89R iche st 49P oore st 76S econ d 76Th ird 93Fo urth 89R iche st no d ata colle cted no d ata colle cted 18 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Key findings. Roma households experience lower living standards than the non-Roma population, including in access to safe drinking water, use of improved water sources and improved sanitation: There are high rates of improved drinking water sources in all countries: equally high in Roma settlements (97 per cent) and nationally (99 per cent). Roma households are less likely to have improved sanitation than non-Roma: the rate is lowest in Bosnia and Herzegovina (73 per cent compared to 94 per cent nationally) and highest in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (91 per cent in Roma settlements and 93 per cent nationally). Only just over a third of the population in the poorest households use improved sanitation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (compared to 95 per cent of the richest). Education is also a critical factor. Roma households are less likely to have hand-washing facilities than non-Roma: 22 per cent of the poorest Roma households do not have a place for hand washing in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Water and soap are not available in 36 per cent of the poorest Roma households in Serbia. Education is a significant determinant. Solid fuels (mainly wood) are mostly used for cooking in Roma households: in Bosnia and Herzegovina, 92 per cent use solid fuels (70 per cent nationally) and 76 per cent in Serbia (32 per cent nationally). There is a link between wealth and education and solid fuel/electricity use in Roma communities in all three countries. 6. Protection: Roma children must be protected from violent discipline methods at home Children must be protected from all forms of physical or mental violence (CRC Article 19) while in the care of parents or others. Corporal or physical punishment in which physical force is used to cause pain or discomfort (such as hitting children with the hand or implement) is regarded as degrading by the Committee on the Rights of the Child (in its General Comment 13). Non-physical forms of punishment which humiliate or threaten a child are also degrading and cruel. The State is responsible for the prevention of all forms of violence against children, whether it is by State officials or by parents, carers, teachers or other children. The Committee on the Rights of the Child emphasises to individual states that no form of corporal punishment should be permitted. INSIGHTS 19 unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis Key findings. Like their peers, Roma children are at risk of being subjected to physical punishment: Similar trends concerning attitudes towards physical punishment and methods of child discipline experienced by children are observed in both Roma and non-Roma households: attitudes are influenced by social-economic disparities, and the education and wealth level of parents are the main determinants. Using physical discipline methods is more prevalent in the poorest households for both Roma and non-Roma. Roma children aged 2-14 years are subjected to physical punishment at a slightly higher rate than non-Roma children: in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia four out of five Roma children are subjected to physical methods of punishment (compared to around 70 per cent among non-Roma), while in Bosnia and Herzegovina the levels are lower at 60 per cent for both. Roma boys in all three countries have a slightly higher rate of severe physical punishment than girls, while no major gender differences are observed for the other methods of punishment. SOCIAL INCLUSION FOR ROMA CHILDREN AND WOMEN: WHAT WILL IT TAKE? The findings presented in this Insights provide clear indication of the priority areas that need urgent attention from duty bearers in order for Roma children to have equal opportunities to develop and flourish as human beings: Address malnutrition affecting young Roma children during their first two years of life: investments in nutritional supplements and social protection programmes today will yield future benefits in terms of reduced healthcare costs, higher earnings, increased productivity and higher GDP. Expand supply of quality inclusive early childhood education and learning for children between 3 years and compulsory school age, and family support services to encourage equally shared parenting: nurturing, stimulating and safe environments promote optimal early childhood development and have positive lifelong effects. Quality preschool education is beneficial for child development outcomes, especially for the most disadvantaged groups, and prepares children for participation and success in basic education. Organised services for the early ages can enable mothers, fathers and other carers to pursue personal and societal goals in the education system, labour market and community. 20 Realizing the rights of Roma children and women unite for childrenwww.unicef.org/ceecis CreditsInsights Issue 2/2014 was written by Anthony Burnett, with contributions by Ana Abdelbasit. Editing was by Elena Gaia and Siraj Mahmudlu, from the UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS. The design was by Yudi Rusdia and lay out by Services Concept. To download the issue, please go to http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/Insights2014_2.pdf This issue is based on the study The rights of Roma children and women: A comparative review and further analysis of findings of MICS surveys in Roma settlements in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Serbia conducted by Aniko Bernat, commissioned by the UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS and carried out with the support of the UNICEF Country Offices in the three countries. This study will be available in 2014 on http://www.unicef.org/ceecis This is the fourth edition of the Insights series of analysis published by the UNICEF Regional Office for CEE/CIS. Insights provides a focused analysis of a special aspect of child rights in the region. Readers are encouraged to reproduce materials from Insights as long as they are not sold commercially. As copyright holders, UNICEF requests due acknowledgement and kindly asks online users to link to the original URL address mentioned above. Improve the quality and inclusiveness of primary and secondary education, particularly for Roma girls and women: educated girls and women are empowered to pursue their goals, participate on equal footing with boys and men in the economic, social and political life, generate ideas and, ultimately, contribute to more dynamic communities with better quality of life. Educated girls and women are also more likely to complete school, marry later and, when they become mothers, have healthier children. The education status of the mother is the most critical determinant of child deprivations documented in this study. The timely completion of a full basic education for Roma children including pre-primary, primary and lower secondary education will bring significant social and economic returns on investment. Secure for Roma girls and women access to quality inclusive health care services and information, in particular related to family planning, counselling and prevention of sexually transmitted diseases, and in the pre-pregnancy, postnatal and infancy periods: informed and healthy girls and women are able to reach their full potential, transform their families, communities and societies, and shape future generations. Improve living standards and address income poverty of Roma households, in particular of Roma women: wealth, including its intersections with gender, is the second most common determinant of the deprivations and equity gaps documented in this study. UNICEF CEECIS/2011/Mcconnico Investments in nutrition today will yield future benefits in reduced healthcare costs. http://www.unicef.org/ceecis http://www.unicef.org/ceecis/Insights2014_2.pdf http://www.services-concept.ch

Footer

Главная
  • Что мы делаем
  • Положение детей в регионе Европы и Центральной Азии
  • Где мы работаем
Исследования и отчеты
  • Публикации
  • Наши партнеры
  • Послы ЮНИСЕФ в Европе и Центральной Азии
Поддержать

Social - ru

Footer Secondary

  • Наши контакты
  • Условия пользования