
Obviously it is easier for richer nations to meet these obligations, and the Convention caters for this by declaring that countries "shall undertake such measures to the maximum extent of their available resources."
This of course is difficult to measure. How can parents and citizens know if their government is attempting to meet these basic social rights to the best of its resources?
The basis of such judgements must be international comparison. A country cannot claim that it is meeting basic needs to the maximum extent of its available resources if far poorer countries are doing much better. A country with a child death rate of 250 per 1000 births or a malnutrition rate of 30%, for example, cannot claim that this is entirely due to poverty if lower rates have been achieved by much poorer countries.
It has been obvious for some time that some nations have achieved levels of child well-being - whether measured by survival, nutrition, or educational attainment - that are far higher than in other countries at a similar economic level.
For the past three years, The Progress of Nations has systematized such comparisons by calculating the average level of child well-being (as measured by such indicators as the under-five mortality rate, the malnutrition rate, and the percentage of children who reach grade 5 of primary school) for any given level of economic development (as measured by per capita GNP).
For each indicator and each country, the gap between the actual level and the average level is termed the national performance gap (NPG). NPGs can, of course, be positive or negative.
Despite inadequate statistics, the NPG provides an approximate measure of how well each country is doing for its children in relation to its resources. It is therefore a measure of Article 4 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child - monitoring whether nations are meeting their children's rights for survival, nutrition, and education "to the maximum extent of their available resources."
The tables below show some of the worst NPGs in child survival, nutrition, and education. NPGs for all countries can be found on pages 50 to 51.
The Convention also calls for the basic rights of children to be met "within the framework of international cooperation." A long-standing part of that framework is the agreement that the industrialized nations should give 0.7% of GNP in official development assistance. The difference between actual aid levels and the 0.7% of their GNP aid target is therefore also a measure of the `performance gap' of the industrialized nations (listed in The aid record).
% of under-fives malnourished
-----------------------------
Actual Expected Gap
India 69 31 -38
Bangladesh 66 35 -31
Mauritania 48 24 -24
Papua New Guinea 35 19 -16
Guatemala 34 19 -15
Indonesia 40 25 -15
Sri Lanka 38 23 -15
Malaysia 23 10 -13
Pakistan 40 27 -13
Philippines 34 21 -13
Namibia 26 15 -11
Under-five deaths per 1000 live births
--------------------------------------
Actual Expected Gap
Niger 320 148 -172
Liberia 217 114 -103
Mauritania 202 106 -96
Sierra Leone 284 191 -93
Mali 217 141 -76
Zambia 203 127 -76
Malawi 223 162 -61
Central African Rep. 177 123 -54
Ghana 170 118 -52
Nigeria 191 139 -52
Namibia 79 37 -42
Turkmenistan 89 48 -41
Senegal 120 83 -37
South Africa 69 32 -37
Bolivia 114 79 -35
Burkina Faso 175 141 -34
Cameroon 113 79 -34
Iraq 71 38 -33
Brazil 63 31 -32
Yemen 137 105 -32
Algeria 68 37 -31
% reaching grade 5
------------------
Actual Expected Gap
Haiti 12 52 -40
Gabon 50 87 -37
Dominican Rep. 41 75 -34
Guatemala 41 75 -34
Afghanistan 13 46 -33
Guinea 26 58 -32
Angola 34 65 -31
Brazil 56 85 -29
Bhutan 9 35 -26
Mali 22 47 -25
Niger 23 45 -22
Burkina Faso 26 47 -21
Colombia 59 80 -21
El Salvador 58 79 -21
Sources: Under-five mortality: UNICEF. Underweight: updated from UNICEF, Child malnutrition: country profiles, 1993. Reaching grade 5: UNICEF calculations from UNESCO data. GNP: World Bank, The World Bank atlas 1995, 1994.
Click here or a full list of national performance gaps - in survival, nutrition, and education.